The leading investment
promotion blog site

My Account

posted on Friday, 11 Jun 2010 by Ruben Anton Comments Off

June 11, 2010. Major investment into attracting professional jobs to Birmingham is “ghettoising” a generation of low-skilled youngsters, according to a former Chamber of Commerce boss.

Dr Derrick Campbell, who runs Race Equality Sandwell, believes local policy makers are too focused on attracting knowledge-intensive firms at the expense of firms offering low-skilled jobs to a large part of the population.

The former chief executive of Sandwell Chamber of Commerce said: “We need to be honest about this debate.

“There are two Birminghams – there’s Colmore Row and then there are places like Aston and Lozells where people are in poverty, have no aspirations, no education and many have CRBs. We need to be clear about attracting jobs for people who don’t have education.”

His comments come as the latest statistics for the region show youth unemployment stands at 23 per cent, almost four times the rate for all people of working age, and the third highest level among UK regions.

City constituencies such as Ladywood, Hodge Hill and Hall Green top the list of unemployment blackspots on a national level. Dr Campbell said there was not enough political will to attract or create jobs which were suitable for people living in these areas.

“We have got to look at low-entry jobs – we’ve got to attract those jobs into the city and we’ve got to ensure that those jobs are there for them to get on the ladder. While they are in work, we need to then work with them to raise their skills and get them upwardly mobile. But if we cater for just the elite group, that’s not going to bridge the gap.”

He said although the city needed a balance of job types, it was unrealistic to think that by focusing on the knowledge economy for inward investment it would result in significantly lower unemployment among Birmingham residents.

“You are talking about the top 10 per cent and ignoring the others,” he said. “We’re spending millions to attract very few high-paying professional jobs, whereas we should be paying millions to upskill the vast majority who aren’t at that level.’’

Read full article

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.